mfrethy

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • mfrethy
    Participant

    This reply is private.

    mfrethy
    Participant

    In all cases of the duplication, I am seeing it on initial import. If I trash/ignore the duplicate entry it will not re-create it on subsequent import/update however if I delete the duplicate permanently it will duplicate it again on subsequent import. It is currently duplicating some but not all recurring events from the Google Calendar import and is duplicating all events that are importing from Facebook and doesn’t matter if it is recurring or not.

    in reply to: Venue Address Importing Incorrectly – Google Calendar #1489836
    mfrethy
    Participant

    Having the same problem.

    Google Calendar location picks up from business verified address:
    Priceless Pet Rescue, 2587 Chino Hills Pkwy, Chino Hills, CA 91709, USA
    Aggregator import picks up name correctly and changes venue address to:
    2901 Chino Ave, Chino Hills, CA (no zip)

    I have also tried manually entering the address on Google Calendar as:
    (no name) 2587 Chino Hills Pkwy, Chino Hills, CA 91709
    Aggregator import still changes venue address to:
    2901 Chino Ave, Chino Hills, CA (no zip)

    What I have found is that if I manually create a venue (i.e. Priceless Pet Rescue) and enter the correct address, then change the location on Google Calendar to just the name (Priceless Pet Rescue) with no address, Aggregator will pickup the existing venue and use that. This works as a temporary solution in our case however causes additional problems for us since we use the Google Calendar in other places that also depend on having the correct address entered in the location.

    It is doing this for all events imported through the Google Calendar feed across multiple locations.
    (e.g. Priceless Pet Rescue, 665 E Foothill Blvd E, Claremont, CA 91711, USA, is being pickup as 3101 Padua Ave, Claremont, CA (no zip) on import). I originally thought that it was picking the geolocation for the city center and using that address but this isn’t the case. Neither address in the above examples appear to have any relation to the actual location.

Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)